Tuesday, December 02, 2008

A Canadian Coalition Government?

Could it actually happen?  We thought the war of the Stephen/Stéphanes was settled on October 14, 2008, but not so.  The opposition parties in the Canadian House of Commons are very publically indicating their intention to bring down the recently elected Conservative government.  And to do so by next Monday December 8th, then intending to govern with a coalition of The Liberals, The New Democrats and The Bloc.  No one will be calling Canada boring this week!

CanadianFlag

The stakes are high.  This is not a chess game.  We do not need instability in government right now.  We need leadership.  We need stability.  We need a sound economic plan; unfortunately there is a very valid range of views on what such a plan should entail.

I have never considered myself affiliated with any political party in Canada.  I vote for what I believe is best for the country at any particular time and have voted for several parties.

This recent political spitefulness and stupidity on the part of the newly elected government at a time when Canada literally needs leadership has cost Prime Minister Harper my vote, a vote he earned just six weeks ago.  I should state that I was a fan of Prime Minister Chretien’s changes to the rules regarding political party fundraising for democratic and accountability reasons, though where any limit on individual contributions should be I do not know.

I do not relish the idea of Stéphane Dion as Prime Minister, but given that he would only be in power for four months it is probably a non-starter.  Prime Minister Harper has definitely brought this crisis on himself.  His recent choices were disappointing to say the least.  (I should add that I caught a glimpse of Stéphane Dion during The House of Commons Question Period today and he seems to have grown a pair)

Will Prime Minister Harper’s government succeed in attempts to divide this would be coalition or to rally the public?  The former, no; the latter, certainly possible.

Whatever happens, the timing of this chaos could hardly be worse.

Suggestions are that Prime Minister Harper will ask the Government General to prorogue Parliament and that it is in reality his only option to hold on to his job at this point.  Would that be a good idea…for Canada?  The Prime Minister certainly has the right to prorogue Parliament if he chooses to exercise that right, but after careful thought I think it would be an economically  irresponsible thing to do.  I do not think Canadians should be expected to wait around until the end of January for their government to do what needs doing, given present worldwide economic realities.  Such an act would certainly be a sharp contrast to the leadership of President-Elect Obama who seems intent of being prepared to lead the moment he is given power. 

I believe it is extremely likely that the coalition government will take power.  I do not see the Liberals, The NDP or the Bloc changing their mind at this point.  Putting it off until the end of January would only hurt Canadians.  The Conservatives need to face the House next Monday and face the consequences of their choices, no matter how hard it will be.

Some are arguing that the coalition is stealing power.  It isn’t; the precedent and laws are clear on that point.  And it is not undemocratic either, as some who voted like I did for the Prime Minister are saying.  If the stats I just acquired are accurate:

Political Party Number of Votes Percentage of the vote
Conservative 5,205,334.00 37.6
Liberal 3,629,990.00 26.2
New Democratic Party 2,517,075.00 18.2
Bloc Québécois 1,379,565.00 10
Green Party 940,747.00 6.8

then, ignoring all parties that received less than 1% of the vote, then at least 61.2 % of voters chose someone other than Stephen Harper to be their Prime Minister.  Even if we exclude the Greens arguing that they did not win a seat or the Bloc for its anti-Canada views, the combined Liberal-NDP would be coalition voters still exceeds Conservative voters.  So whether we like it or not fellow Stephen Harper voters, the majority of Canadians did not agree with us.

If this coalition does in fact take power, I sincerely hope it will be a successful experiment in I guess a more representative form of government. 

I feel that given the economic realities today, Prime  Minister Harper’s tighter fiscal policy may only serve to worsen the recession and decrease private investment and is likely wrongheaded, so I am open to hearing what the coalition proposes.

Canadians need for any coalition to work.  If it does occur then the three parties better dam well engage in cross party co-operation the likes that none of us Joe-Publics have witnessed anytime lately.  Which means, that no The Liberals, The New Democrats and The Bloc will not agree on everything, but they had better compromise regularly, for the benefit of all Canadians.  Compromise: look it up!  After the Conservatives’ recent childish behaviour, Canadians need some adults in Ottawa during this economic crisis.  Adults, not little boys throwing their trucks at each other.

Sage Spencer



Next Blogum: January 2009
Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe with Bloglines

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

President Barack Obama, the 44th President of The United States of America – Inclusion Rocks!

Where were you on November 4, 2008 at 11:57 pm EST? 

How often do we get to make history? Almost never!  Anyone who voted for Barack Obama today fashioned this watershed moment.  “We the people” now includes all American men.  Congratulations Senator Obama!  Thank you for demonstrating once and for all that the content of a person’s character and not the colour of one’s skin is what should determine a man’s worthiness to be the President of The United States of America.

PresidentBarackObama  

While I have never understood, apparently since childhood according to my schoolteachers, measuring a man by his degree of deposition of skin pigmentation,  I have never failed to grasp how important skin colour and the bizarre concept of race is to so many people, too many people. 

I am someone who has celebrated every unjust barrier that has been broken down, no matter how small.  I find the breaking down of such barriers electrifying.  The thrill and significance of the wall torn down this evening cannot be underestimated.  Even if it did not mean all the things that it means for America, and offer the hope that it does after the damage done to America in the last eight years, and only meant one thing, that little black boys and girls in American can now say without thinking, “one day I will be President of the United States of America”, then it would still be astonishing.

This election was about many things: one of which was a competition between hope and fear.  Hope won.  That is something to celebrate after eight years of being led by fear.  Rosa Louise McCauley Parks and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. are smiling this evening.  And so is Mrs. Madelyn Dunham.  She is watching over her grandson tonight and feeling pride in the boy she helped raise to be President.  The timing of her passing was destined.  She brought him as far as she could.  She voted for him and she passed on when she knew he would be okay.

While the statistics of exit polls, shown on the main television networks, made it clear that there still remains a part of the US population that let Senator Obama’s skin colour influence their vote,  unspeakably huge progress was made today. 

President-Elect Obama has accomplished things already, including demonstrating that a political campaign for the Presidency of The United States of America, and therefore all other political campaigns, can be run and won without sacrificing one’s dignity or integrity.  His raising the bar for the standards of behaviour among politicians is a welcome change.  Lets us hope, however naive it may seem, that the Karl Roves of the world are destined for the dustbin of campaign history and that humanity can progress not regress.

Simply by winning the Presidency, after carrying out his campaign in the manner he chose to, President-Elect Obama has already applied a small bandaid on the large wound created by the Bush Administration.

Four years ago, I felt a sadness I cannot describe when President George W. Bush was elected to a second term of office.  I felt like I was watching the decline of the American empire.  Did people not understand the further damage the Bush Administration was capable of doing?

Hope was quiet these past eight years; at times it seemed barely audible.  Fear was in charge.

Tonight my faith was restored when hope won out over fear.   There is an opportunity for change, if we have the courage to embrace it with all of our hands, together as one people.

And while the popular vote indicates that America remains tonight a divided country, I have faith that President–Elect Obama’s integrity of character, sober and calm strength of spirit,  uniting, organizing and conciliatory nature and great passion for America tenders the opportunity of profound and noble change.

As he has said, “Yes we can!”

God bless the new first family of America: Barack, Michelle, Malia and Sasha Obama.

Bring on the progress!

Sage Spencer



Next Blogum: December 2008
Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe with Bloglines

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Ode to Manly Men

My eldest sister, Katherine, was confabulating tonight at dinner about her favourite show, Grey’s Anatomy.  She was imagining being one of its writers and the changes she would make.  Her opinions about what is presently wrong with the show, got me to thinking about something that is most right about this recently started season five - the introduction of manly man, Dr. Owen Hunt, played by actor Kevin McKidd.

Dr.Hunt2_3

Major Hunt’s scenes in the season premiere on September 25th had him triaging victims from a car crash, performing a tracheotomy with a ball point pen and attending to “his patients” after he showed up at Seattle Grace in the ambulance with the EMTs.  We witnessed him passionately trying to save the walking ability of one of the car crash victims, now a patient of Dr. Sheppard and Dr. Torres’.  We also discovered that Major Hunt does not worry about stepping on toes when it comes to fighting for his patients.  He accomplished all of this while injured, from being at the tail-end of the car crash domino himself.  Once Chief of Surgery, Dr. Webber, ordered Dr. Cristina Yang to tend to Major Hunt’s injuries, he proceeded to staple his own skin without freezing it first .  These are the things we know about manly man Major Owen Hunt so far.  Oh yeah and that the army doc on leave from Iraq can kiss a woman and curl her toes, though Dr. Cristina Yang has yet to admit he did.

What sort of manly man he really is is quite unknown at this point, but my curiosity is piqued, my hopes are high and I am delighted by the chemistry between his portrayer Kevin McKidd and talented actress Sandra Oh. I hanker to know what makes Major Hunt tick, what his personal and professional history is, how he ended up in the military and does he always kiss women like he kissed Dr. Yang at the end of episode one, in my opinion the best TV first kiss in a decade.  If my curiosity is shared by enough Grey’s fans, then there exists a real opportunity to write an unforgettable story.

My welcome of his character has got me considering whether there are less manly men about in 2008, on screen and in real life, such that when we see one, like Major Owen Hunt, we are struck by his testosterone-self?  Is it possible North American men are not as brave anymore?

What a manly man is in 2008 is a hard enough question to answer in and of itself.  My opinions are certainly from the female perspective.

It has always been easy and simplistic to see the competition between the male archetypes, if you will, with the men on one side who are gentlemen, who respect women as equals, are aware of their own feelings and take care of their families and on the other side guys whose manhood is reliant on macho behaviour, whose chauvinistic beliefs demand having control of 'their' women and are generally perceived as emotionally repressed.

But to me, the ‘greys’ somewhere in the middle of that continuum are the most interesting and definitely the more sexy.  The manly men who can who trach your throat with a ball point pen, save your life and respect a  women as equal to himself.  Now that is sexy! 

Who are these ‘grey’ manly men.  Men of action.  Brave men.  Men who are ingenious.  Men who see and act, not freeze, look away or walk away. Men who are passionate.  As Major Hunt said to Dr. Yang, shortly after meeting her, “You should ditch this place.  Go for the adventure.  You telling me this place gives you a rush, a high”.  Men who care.  Men who say this is who I am, not as an excuse for any behaviour, but to own themselves and take responsibility for themselves.  They hide behind no one.  If something goes horribly wrong, these are the guys you want around.  Hence Major Owen Hunt is a 'trauma' surgeon.

‘So’,   I am looking forward to finding out what shade of grey this “Grey's” boy will be?

Sage Spencer



Next Blogum: November 2008
Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe with Bloglines

Thursday, September 18, 2008

I never wanted to be a mother, until I gave up my own mother.

Like too many children in this world, I grew up in an abusive household. Like some of them, I was the only child among my siblings that was abused. Don’t get me wrong, we were all neglected in various ways, as my parents, while presumably doing the best they knew, failed to meet many of the needs that every child has in this life.

My name is Sage Spencer and I was the Differentiated Child in a family of five children.

The Differentiated Child is the term I have coined for my situation and that of others like me. I Googled it and found nothing. It is possible my situation is called something else by the professionals who study these sorts of things. I am not a mental health professional. I speak only as a survivor.

While it took me many adult years to even see what was done to me, let alone understand it or extricate myself from its chains, I realize in hindsight that my first experience with a Differentiated Child was likely as a little girl – as a childhood friend may have been one as well.

At the point in time that I knew my possibly Differentiated childhood friend, I was young, young enough not to understand sex. My friend, I will call her Catherine, came to tell me that she was leaving our primary school. While the order of events is fuzzy to me, I remember clearly being in the presence of my teacher and Catherine and being instructed by my teacher not to discuss what I had learned from my friend that day with anyone else. I realize now that it may have been inappropriate of my teacher to attempt to silence me, but her intentions were all good. Catherine had presumably told me because she trusted me. I was the keeper of all secrets, even then.

What she told me that day was that she had to move to another school. I asked her whether her family was moving far away. She told me that her siblings were not leaving the school, only she was. I remember being confused by that answer. Catherine was a very sweet girl. The only reason I could conceive of at that age was that badly behaved kids might have to leave school, so I did not understand. She told me that her dad was doing things to her that he was not supposed to, so she had to go live somewhere else. I remember the silence after that. I remember where we were standing on the grounds of my school, as if it was yesterday, as my young mind tried to process her response. It is certainly one of my strongest childhood memories. I knew that it meant something sexual, but I did not really understand. In hindsight, I cannot believe that I asked her the next question, but when I look at one of my nieces, today a similar age, and the questions she regularly asks, I realize it is just the difference between children and adults. In some form or another, I asked her whether her dad was doing things to her brother and sisters as well. It seemed an appropriate question to my young self. What I do remember clearly, was that she said, “no, just me” in a manner that now as an adult, suggests to me that that is what she believed to be true. Whether she was a Differentiated Child, the child targeted for abuse, in her family of four, I will likely never know, though I will wonder about her for the rest of my life.

I was a Differentiated Child, the child targeted for abuse, but as with all children like me, I presume, I was brainwashed into believing I deserved it.

None of what was done to me was at all apparent to me, until I endured too large a number of tragedies in a row to cope with on my own, something I thought I had perfected until then, and needed guidance by way of therapy, something I never thought I would do until I did.

While I kept the abuse hidden as long as I could after starting therapy, I did this mostly unconsciously. Abuse had been normalized for me. I did not understand exactly what I was keeping hidden, because I did not grasp what had been done to me. To this day, I have never told anyone all the details of the abuse, or even most of them. The therapist who I saw for a time got bits and afterward my best friend some more bits. While I have come a long way since those first days, I do not know if I will ever tell my whole story. It is too humiliating and I have suffered enough.

What I now know, clearly, is that outside of my home I was well liked; inside my own home, I was not. This was not a behaviour specific situation, in that my behaviour was inappropriate inside my home and appropriate outside of my home, as can be the case for some children with situation specific behaviour issues.

Outside my home was easy. School was a refuge, a place where the rules were clear. You behaved properly, were respectful, did all your schoolwork and the adults not only liked you, but wrote beautiful words about how you were a pleasure to teach. I did the same things at home, but in that environment I was instead defective, disgusting and needed to be regularly punched and all manners of physical, verbal and emotional abuse.

I have figured out several things now about myself as a Differentiated Child.

1. That my parents used me as their emotional and physical punching bag. Whatever emotions they chose not to take responsibility for themselves, they took out on me. Why me, and not one of my four siblings, I assume I will never know the answer to that question.

2. That I did not deserve any of the physical assaults, the neglect or the emotional and verbal abuse I endured. As an adult Differentiated Child survivor, I have now finally separated myself from many of the brainwashing effects, enough almost to see the ridiculousness of ever thinking I did deserve it. Looking back, at the raw facts - as Dr. Phil might say, with his litmus logic test: is it true; does it serve my best interest; does it protect and prolong my health; - I was a very polite child, a respectful child, a good girl, that everyone outside my home seemed to like and someone always entrusted with responsibility beyond my age. How much of that character was created in response to my circumstances and how much was nature I do not know. But I know this, whereas while outside my home I had, from childhood to adulthood, authority after authority attest to my character by word, document or award, inside my home I was deserving and warranted regular abuse, even though I was in fact the same person.

3. That I have never had any desire to be a mother, because of the abuse. By that I mean, that I felt no interest in being a mother, no biological desire to carry a baby or to raise a child, things that all my girlfriends seemed to have always had. I have spent my life working with children and yet never felt one single moment of wanting to be a mother, until very recently, not one. Certainly, every woman has at least one moment I told myself regularly? Person after person attempted to convince me that I would change my mind. At one point, I seriously considered whether I had some chemical missing in my makeup as a girl that facilitated that biological drive. I Googled that as well, to no avail. Then one day, I had one of those Oprah defined light bulb moments. It was quick, subtle and quite soft, not at all loud, scary, frightening or even upsetting. It just came, like a truth that had reached its way out of my gut, from where it had been hiding for decades, just when my soul decided I was ready. I had never wanted to be a mother because I was afraid I would be my mother to a child.

4. That there were signs, that any of you looking out for Differentiated Children could see. From childhood to adulthood, without exception, every friend and boyfriend that walked through my life asked me in one way or another one of two things: ‘why does your mother hate you so much’ and ‘why does your mother treat you so differently from your brothers and sisters’?. Never once did I ever say anything bad about my mother to anyone of these people. I was in denial about these truths until recently and unconsciously I did not want anyone to know. It was self-preservation. My friends’ observations arose simply from being part of my life.

5. That my reading about the details of differentiation, revealed by the siblings of Jeffrey Baldwin to their foster mother, after Jeffrey’s death by abuse, saved me. I like to give credit to Jeffrey Baldwin for that.

CBC, The Fifth Estate, Interview with Jeffrey Baldwin's siblings' foster mother

For the first time, I realized I was not all of the hateful things I had been labeled. I did not deserve or warrant regular abuse. I was a Differentiated Child, just as he was, and while he paid with his life for the abuse he endured, the process of separating the children into acceptable and unacceptable was the same. The Differentiated treatment was the same.

I now know, with gratitude, that I am not only not my mother, but I am in fact nothing like her, something I think may be a miracle.

My mother is cold, cruel, insincere, a compulsive liar (I considered the possibility of pathological at one point) and incredibly abusive. Trying to get my mother to take responsibility for anything and I mean literally anything that she has done or to tell the truth is like trying to pin Jell-O to a wall. These are strong and hateful words; I realize this. This is the first and perhaps last time I will ever utter or write them. As someone who was regularly called abusive names by my mother, it feels sinfully hypocritical to write that. However, as a wise therapist once said to me, if it is true, then it is not abuse. I understand that my mother has not been all these things to everyone she has encountered in her life, though she did manage to scare everyone from small children to burly construction workers. She was all those things to me.

While it has not been that long since I was asked by a therapist to effectively say something good about myself and could think of nothing, I can say now, albeit uncomfortably, that I am warm, gentle, sincere, honest (maybe even in response to my mom’s lack of truthfulness which always made me very uncomfortable) and have never even raised my voice to a child. I also have many faults, just like anyone else.

All that being said, I still fear that there is something inside me, something that will live what it has learned. Therefore, I remain childless at this time. But I am dreaming of children, for the first time in my life.

Sage Spencer



Next blogum: October 2008
Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe with Bloglines