Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Sending the police to fight Jamie Oliver, the big bad scary vegetable peddler!?!


On the second season of 'Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution' airing Tuesday nights at 8PM ET on ABC, Jamie Oliver is having an even harder time than he did first time around in Huntington, West Virginia. Apparently the school system in the fattest city in America is more open to change than the Los Angeles Unified School District, the second-largest public school system in the United States.

So far the only toe in the door he has gotten is at West Adams Preparatory School who WANT him there but can only get him in the door to teach cooking classes because the school operates in partnership with the LAUDS. The Los Angeles Unified School District has forbid him from even entering the school cafeteria. If he violates the terms, West Adams Preparatory School risks loosing its funding.

Clearly the Los Angeles Unified School District fears bad publicity but just how bad is the food being fed to children in the Los Angeles Unified School District if they are THAT afraid of Jamie Oliver?

If you need to send the police to keep kids from a guy wanting to feed them vegetables, what the hell are you feeding children in Los Angeles?

Next Blogum: May 2011

Sage Spencer

Add to Technorati Favorites Subscribe with Bloglines

Monday, January 31, 2011

A white chick’s diatribe on the N-word.

So I nervously venture into this blog post…

I do not know why other people blog but my decision to start blogging was made as an exercise in self-expression, for reasons relating to my childhood.  I wanted to exercise the freedom to express myself and I wanted to see what would come out of me when I wrote.  I am not a writer.  I have no dreams to become one.  Contrary to any evidence suggesting otherwise levitating in the blogosphere, such as an occasional link to one of my blog postings under a Huffington Post post, I honestly do not care if anyone ever reads my blog.

This is only the second time I have been genuinely uncomfortable when blogging.  I guess that means that in this instance I am nervous about someone possibly reading this post. 

I am considering as I write this that being uncomfortable when writing is probably a good thing.  I have to remember that when choosing something to blog about going forward.

What has prompted this post is the decision by publishing company NewSouth Books to print new editions of Mark Twain’s “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer” removing the N-word and replacing it with “slave”.

SS_January2011_HuckleberryFinn1

I am a book lover.  The story is told that I read a book every day as a child.  I find that hard to believe but that is the story.  I certainly remember reading every chance I could.  My library card was well used.  I also remember hiding books under the covers and as soon as my parents were out of sight reading them with whatever light I could get.  These days I do not read books nearly as often as I would like to but I do own many.  For some people  they would just be paper taking up space.  For me, each is its own little life force.  It is their individual life forces that have kept me from yet buying a e-reader even though the girl who loves tech would have even been excited to use one in beta.  I read enough on a computer screen.  When I read a book, I want it to feel like a book.

I decided that I should blog about the New South publishing decision when I realized that I had felt a visceral reaction upon hearing the news.  Immediately, unequivocally, I felt it was wrong.  Then I hesitated because that meant talking about the N-word, which other than one comment under a HuffPo post I have never done before.

So…here goes…this white chick, so pale that the lightest foundation is always too dark for my skin is going to talk about a word used to lynch black people!?!

Maybe I just don't know enough bad words but to me the N-word has always been the most hateful word in the English language.  I always told myself that anyone that used it would not be welcome at any dinner table in any home of mine. 

But then things got murkier because while I am not American-born, I am a citizen and parts of the African-American community use the N-word in its reclaimed form.  Would I now not welcome an African-American who used that word to my table???  I have never had to make that decision as none of the African-Americans in my life use that word or at least they have never done so around me???

SS_January2011_ChrisRock The truth is that until recently, post the NewSouth Books decision, I had only ever heard the N-word spoken ONCE, yes once, by my favourite comedian Chris Rock during a performance.  Most people in the audience were laughing when he used the N-word.  I was not one of them.  My senses felt assaulted hearing that word over and over again.  I did not find it funny. 

The first time I saw the N-word written in a comment under a YouTube vid, I flagged it, my only YouTube flag.  I soon after realized, horrifyingly, that it was all over YouTube.  I have flagged three things at the Huffington Post.  Two were cursor accidents (I am having serious issues with one button on my touchpad).  The third was the N-word.  Sometime after that HuffPo N-word flag there was a thread at HuffPo that resulted in many people using the N-word in their comments below the post.  I had to stop reading the thread.

I realize that the N-word has been reclaimed by some African-Americans and co-opted to mean different things, some as affectionate as dude.  I use dude.  I am sure I have used dude on this blog as I like that word but I would never use the N-word.  I don’t care over how many years the N-word is reclaimed and by whatever percentage of African–Americans, it will never mean ‘dude’ to me.

On the one hand the double standard is fine.  Whites with few exceptions (for example: reading and discussing its use in literature, discussing its history, as part of a historical play, educating children) should never use that word.  Agreed.  If a white person uses it as a compellation, then they don’t respect black people but I honestly believe that the double standard contributes to its continued use by white people.

I also argue with those who believe that it has been reclaimed.  It hasn’t really.  If if HAD white people would be able to use it.  ‘Queer’ as a word has travelled a journey to the point where it is pretty socially acceptable to refer to the queer community though I prefer gay & lesbian community or LGBT community.  Along with being white, I am also straight, so I really don’t get  a vote there either.  However, I do not believe it will EVER be acceptable to refer to the nigger community.  Yes, I just typed that word.  *shaking head*

SS_January2011_Lynching2 The N-word has been used to dehumanize people and lynch people.  I think its continued use in reclaimed form is a slap in the face to older African-Americans and African-American ancestors who were slaves, yes even if you change the ending from ‘er’ to ‘a’, reclaim it and say that it now means ‘dude’.  It seems disrespectful to African-American ancestors on a level that I cannot put into words.  To me it is no more acceptable to use the N-word than it is to joke about the Holocaust. SS_January2011_Lynching3

Okay Sage…then why are you upset about the NewSouth Books decision?  Wouldn’t removing that word from Mark Twain’s “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” make you happy then?

No, it would not.  It would be an attempt to sanitize and amputate history.   Censorship erases history.  We should never erase history, especially not evil history.  We need to educate not amputate!

It is fine to argue that children below a certain age should not be taught the novel in class.  It is fine to argue that they have not developed cognitively to a level where they can understand that this book was written in 1884 and not 2011 and that there will be words in there that they can read, even aloud in class, but can then not use them as compellations toward real live human beings.  That is a fair argument.  But amputating American history….no!

I walked to a local second hand book store yesterday looking for an unsanitized copy of Huck Finn.  I bought one.  I started to read it last night.  I have already read its first use of the N-word:

Miss Watson, she kept pecking at me, and it got tiresome and lonesome.  By and by they fetched the niggers in and had prayers, and then everybody was off to bed.  I went up to my room with a piece of candle and put it on the table.  Then I sat down in a chair by the window and tried to think of something cheerful, but it wasn’t no use.  I felt so lonesome, I most wished I was dead., p.5.

This is a picture from the front cover. 

SS_January2011_HuckleberryFinn2

The N-word has an evil history and it will always have the power to hurt and reinforce myths about African-Americans.  I completely understand any attempt to reclaim the word but has this rewriting of its meaning really taken away any of its power if a white person were to use it in 2011?  That said, the N-word’s evil history is not a reason to cower or amputate.  It is a reason to educate. 

We cannot ban words but we can use the classroom as a place to educate, including educating where a word like the N-word should and should not be used.  Any child of mine will read the original Huckleberry Finn and will learn how that word was used and continues to be used to dehumanize people. 

SS-January2011-NWord I think that should be the goal.  We should teach children that it is ok to read Huckleberry Finn aloud in class but it is unacceptable and hateful in 2011 to call African Americans nigger or nigga.  *shaking head again*  It is an opportunity to teach children about history.  It is an opportunity to teach children responsible behaviour via responsible speech.  It is an opportunity to teach children that we are always going to offend people but that not using the N-word is about human dignity and human respect.  Words have the power to harm and the power to heal.  We need to teach children to use them consciously and responsibly.

In light of recent events and much irresponsible speech, now is an excellent time to do so.

So…would I welcome my favorite comedian and his family to my dining table?  I would…BUT…if he used the N-word in my home, I would tell him that if he did so again I would have to ask him to leave.  Sorry Chris!

Next Blogum: February 2011

Sage Spencer

Add to Technorati Favorites Subscribe with Bloglines

Friday, May 28, 2010

I am boycotting Israeli products.

I just bought a Florida grapefruit instead of an Israeli one. For the first time, I made the conscious decision not to buy an Israeli product. I think that means that I just made the decision to boycott Israeli products.

SS_May2010_FloridaGrapefruit I did not go the store today with the intention of boycotting Israeli products but I just arrived home with a Florida grapefruit when I would have otherwise chosen the other grapefruit, which happened to be grown in Israel. It was just by chance I noticed the Product of Israel sign; I rarely if ever look.

I have considered boycotting Israeli products before now. I almost did it immediately after the illegal wall was built in the occupied Palestinian territories. Each time I almost made the decision, I then relented, returning to belief in dialogue and constructive engagement. This decision has been a long time coming for me. As I now make it, part of me is ashamed that it took me this long to do so.

I always thought that if I ever did make the decision to boycott Israel, that any blog I wrote explaining why would be very long…but this one won’t be.

I am making this decision because the Palestinians deserve justice and I simply no longer believe, based on Israel’s actions, including the continued illegal settlements, that Israel has any intention of doing what is necessary to make that happen. Israel can have land or peace and they continue to choose land. I also believe that the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian war have the potential to create endless generations of suffering and I do not think the children being born today should have to pay for their parents’ refusal to do the right thing. Enough Israeli and Palestinian children have paid, in a myriad of ways, for their parents’ refusal to do the right thing.

Do I think this one girl boycotting the Israeli economy can bring peace? Of course not, but it is still the right thing to do at this point in time and if enough people do the right thing, who knows?

As a first step, I will no longer consciously purchase any product made in Israel. Why, because by supporting the Israeli economy I feel I am complicit in the oppression of the Palestinian people.

How do I go about doing that? I am not sure yet. After all, I just got home from the grocers, took a photo of my Florida grapefruit and sat down at my computer.

I do not know how many of the products I normally buy originate in Israel. One that I am aware of that does is Naot footwear. I have two pairs of Naot sandals. If my sandals were not Israeli, I would continue to buy them as they are very comfortable. I can find other sandals.

SS_May2010_IsraeliPalestinianPeace Every human being needs freedom in order to have dignity. As long as Israel keeps the Palestinians captive, it denies them freedom and therefore dignity. I hope that one day Israel will do the right thing. Israel is herself imprisoned and will never truly be free until she cedes denying freedom to the Palestinians.

And I pray… that one day soon, there will be peace in Israel-Palestine. God Bless all who live in Israel-Palestine.


Next Blogum: June 2010


Sage Spencer

Add to Technorati Favorites Subscribe with Bloglines

Thursday, September 18, 2008

I never wanted to be a mother, until I gave up my own mother.

Like too many children in this world, I grew up in an abusive household. Like some of them, I was the only child among my siblings that was abused. Don’t get me wrong, we were all neglected in various ways, as my parents, while presumably doing the best they knew, failed to meet many of the needs that every child has in this life.

My name is Sage Spencer and I was the Differentiated Child in a family of five children.

The Differentiated Child is the term I have coined for my situation and that of others like me. I Googled it and found nothing. It is possible my situation is called something else by the professionals who study these sorts of things. I am not a mental health professional. I speak only as a survivor.

While it took me many adult years to even see what was done to me, let alone understand it or extricate myself from its chains, I realize in hindsight that my first experience with a Differentiated Child was likely as a little girl – as a childhood friend may have been one as well.

At the point in time that I knew my possibly Differentiated childhood friend, I was young, young enough not to understand sex. My friend, I will call her Catherine, came to tell me that she was leaving our primary school. While the order of events is fuzzy to me, I remember clearly being in the presence of my teacher and Catherine and being instructed by my teacher not to discuss what I had learned from my friend that day with anyone else. I realize now that it may have been inappropriate of my teacher to attempt to silence me, but her intentions were all good. Catherine had presumably told me because she trusted me. I was the keeper of all secrets, even then.

What she told me that day was that she had to move to another school. I asked her whether her family was moving far away. She told me that her siblings were not leaving the school, only she was. I remember being confused by that answer. Catherine was a very sweet girl. The only reason I could conceive of at that age was that badly behaved kids might have to leave school, so I did not understand. She told me that her dad was doing things to her that he was not supposed to, so she had to go live somewhere else. I remember the silence after that. I remember where we were standing on the grounds of my school, as if it was yesterday, as my young mind tried to process her response. It is certainly one of my strongest childhood memories. I knew that it meant something sexual, but I did not really understand. In hindsight, I cannot believe that I asked her the next question, but when I look at one of my nieces, today a similar age, and the questions she regularly asks, I realize it is just the difference between children and adults. In some form or another, I asked her whether her dad was doing things to her brother and sisters as well. It seemed an appropriate question to my young self. What I do remember clearly, was that she said, “no, just me” in a manner that now as an adult, suggests to me that that is what she believed to be true. Whether she was a Differentiated Child, the child targeted for abuse, in her family of four, I will likely never know, though I will wonder about her for the rest of my life.

I was a Differentiated Child, the child targeted for abuse, but as with all children like me, I presume, I was brainwashed into believing I deserved it.

None of what was done to me was at all apparent to me, until I endured too large a number of tragedies in a row to cope with on my own, something I thought I had perfected until then, and needed guidance by way of therapy, something I never thought I would do until I did.

While I kept the abuse hidden as long as I could after starting therapy, I did this mostly unconsciously. Abuse had been normalized for me. I did not understand exactly what I was keeping hidden, because I did not grasp what had been done to me. To this day, I have never told anyone all the details of the abuse, or even most of them. The therapist who I saw for a time got bits and afterward my best friend some more bits. While I have come a long way since those first days, I do not know if I will ever tell my whole story. It is too humiliating and I have suffered enough.

What I now know, clearly, is that outside of my home I was well liked; inside my own home, I was not. This was not a behaviour specific situation, in that my behaviour was inappropriate inside my home and appropriate outside of my home, as can be the case for some children with situation specific behaviour issues.

Outside my home was easy. School was a refuge, a place where the rules were clear. You behaved properly, were respectful, did all your schoolwork and the adults not only liked you, but wrote beautiful words about how you were a pleasure to teach. I did the same things at home, but in that environment I was instead defective, disgusting and needed to be regularly punched and all manners of physical, verbal and emotional abuse.

I have figured out several things now about myself as a Differentiated Child.

1. That my parents used me as their emotional and physical punching bag. Whatever emotions they chose not to take responsibility for themselves, they took out on me. Why me, and not one of my four siblings, I assume I will never know the answer to that question.

2. That I did not deserve any of the physical assaults, the neglect or the emotional and verbal abuse I endured. As an adult Differentiated Child survivor, I have now finally separated myself from many of the brainwashing effects, enough almost to see the ridiculousness of ever thinking I did deserve it. Looking back, at the raw facts - as Dr. Phil might say, with his litmus logic test: is it true; does it serve my best interest; does it protect and prolong my health; - I was a very polite child, a respectful child, a good girl, that everyone outside my home seemed to like and someone always entrusted with responsibility beyond my age. How much of that character was created in response to my circumstances and how much was nature I do not know. But I know this, whereas while outside my home I had, from childhood to adulthood, authority after authority attest to my character by word, document or award, inside my home I was deserving and warranted regular abuse, even though I was in fact the same person.

3. That I have never had any desire to be a mother, because of the abuse. By that I mean, that I felt no interest in being a mother, no biological desire to carry a baby or to raise a child, things that all my girlfriends seemed to have always had. I have spent my life working with children and yet never felt one single moment of wanting to be a mother, until very recently, not one. Certainly, every woman has at least one moment I told myself regularly? Person after person attempted to convince me that I would change my mind. At one point, I seriously considered whether I had some chemical missing in my makeup as a girl that facilitated that biological drive. I Googled that as well, to no avail. Then one day, I had one of those Oprah defined light bulb moments. It was quick, subtle and quite soft, not at all loud, scary, frightening or even upsetting. It just came, like a truth that had reached its way out of my gut, from where it had been hiding for decades, just when my soul decided I was ready. I had never wanted to be a mother because I was afraid I would be my mother to a child.

4. That there were signs, that any of you looking out for Differentiated Children could see. From childhood to adulthood, without exception, every friend and boyfriend that walked through my life asked me in one way or another one of two things: ‘why does your mother hate you so much’ and ‘why does your mother treat you so differently from your brothers and sisters’?. Never once did I ever say anything bad about my mother to anyone of these people. I was in denial about these truths until recently and unconsciously I did not want anyone to know. It was self-preservation. My friends’ observations arose simply from being part of my life.

5. That my reading about the details of differentiation, revealed by the siblings of Jeffrey Baldwin to their foster mother, after Jeffrey’s death by abuse, saved me. I like to give credit to Jeffrey Baldwin for that.

CBC, The Fifth Estate, Interview with Jeffrey Baldwin's siblings' foster mother

For the first time, I realized I was not all of the hateful things I had been labeled. I did not deserve or warrant regular abuse. I was a Differentiated Child, just as he was, and while he paid with his life for the abuse he endured, the process of separating the children into acceptable and unacceptable was the same. The Differentiated treatment was the same.

I now know, with gratitude, that I am not only not my mother, but I am in fact nothing like her, something I think may be a miracle.

My mother is cold, cruel, insincere, a compulsive liar (I considered the possibility of pathological at one point) and incredibly abusive. Trying to get my mother to take responsibility for anything and I mean literally anything that she has done or to tell the truth is like trying to pin Jell-O to a wall. These are strong and hateful words; I realize this. This is the first and perhaps last time I will ever utter or write them. As someone who was regularly called abusive names by my mother, it feels sinfully hypocritical to write that. However, as a wise therapist once said to me, if it is true, then it is not abuse. I understand that my mother has not been all these things to everyone she has encountered in her life, though she did manage to scare everyone from small children to burly construction workers. She was all those things to me.

While it has not been that long since I was asked by a therapist to effectively say something good about myself and could think of nothing, I can say now, albeit uncomfortably, that I am warm, gentle, sincere, honest (maybe even in response to my mom’s lack of truthfulness which always made me very uncomfortable) and have never even raised my voice to a child. I also have many faults, just like anyone else.

All that being said, I still fear that there is something inside me, something that will live what it has learned. Therefore, I remain childless at this time. But I am dreaming of children, for the first time in my life.

Sage Spencer



Next blogum: October 2008
Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe with Bloglines